
estimated mean 1890-2000: $132K
[chart: after Schiller]

 Japan, during the latter part of the war, was desperate to bring the hurt to United States soil.  It was suffering terribly from the effects of long range bombardment presaged by the largely symbolic Doolittle Raid after Pearl Harbor.  Japan did not have a V-2 program, and its atomic research program was crude. It did have strong paper balloons used in stratospheric research.  A military man, Major General Sueyoshi Kusaba came up with the idea of using the balloons as a bomb delivery device.  By floating a hydrogen filled balloon into the prevailing easterly jet streams at 30,000 feet an attached bomb could reach the western United States in three days.  The Japanese floated thousands of balloons, but only about 300 bombs dropped over the western United States.  The operation never amounted to more than a nuisance, but incendiaries did start a few forest fires, and a few civilian casualties were inflicted.  The US military, for fear of civilian panic, kept the public in the dark about the operation.
Japan, during the latter part of the war, was desperate to bring the hurt to United States soil.  It was suffering terribly from the effects of long range bombardment presaged by the largely symbolic Doolittle Raid after Pearl Harbor.  Japan did not have a V-2 program, and its atomic research program was crude. It did have strong paper balloons used in stratospheric research.  A military man, Major General Sueyoshi Kusaba came up with the idea of using the balloons as a bomb delivery device.  By floating a hydrogen filled balloon into the prevailing easterly jet streams at 30,000 feet an attached bomb could reach the western United States in three days.  The Japanese floated thousands of balloons, but only about 300 bombs dropped over the western United States.  The operation never amounted to more than a nuisance, but incendiaries did start a few forest fires, and a few civilian casualties were inflicted.  The US military, for fear of civilian panic, kept the public in the dark about the operation. The worst oil spill in history occurred twenty years ago yesterday when the supertanker Exxon Valdez went aground in Prince William Sound, Alaska.  The captain was sleeping off drink and an inexperienced third mate was at the helm when the ship struck Bligh Reef in the early morning of March 24th. The reef ripped the bottom of the single hull tanker causing the rupture of its oil tanks and the release of 11 million gallons of viscous crude oil into an unspoiled environment.   The human response to the spill was initially disorganized and lackadaisical, but after a severe winter storm spread the spill farther into the sound on the third day clean up operations began and thereafter expanded exponentially.  The clean up became the largest private project in Alaska since the Alaska pipeline, employing 11,000 people at one point.  The clean up cost about $2 billion and lasted four summers. The spill covered 10,000 square miles of coastline, fouling two national parks, a national forest, two wildlife refuges, five state parks, four critical habitat areas and a state game sanctuary.  The spill disrupted the local economy and culture that focused on fishing.  The effects of the toxic, high sulfur sludge--crude mixed with seawater--on wildlife was extremely devastating.  An estimated 250,000 seabirds were killed.  Fourteen of the thirty six resident killer whales disappeared.  One thousand sea otter carcasses were recovered.  One hundred fifty-one bald eagles were confirmed dead.  The Pacific herring population crashed in 1993 and is still too low to sustain a commercial fishery.  The depressing list of wildlife casualties goes on.
The worst oil spill in history occurred twenty years ago yesterday when the supertanker Exxon Valdez went aground in Prince William Sound, Alaska.  The captain was sleeping off drink and an inexperienced third mate was at the helm when the ship struck Bligh Reef in the early morning of March 24th. The reef ripped the bottom of the single hull tanker causing the rupture of its oil tanks and the release of 11 million gallons of viscous crude oil into an unspoiled environment.   The human response to the spill was initially disorganized and lackadaisical, but after a severe winter storm spread the spill farther into the sound on the third day clean up operations began and thereafter expanded exponentially.  The clean up became the largest private project in Alaska since the Alaska pipeline, employing 11,000 people at one point.  The clean up cost about $2 billion and lasted four summers. The spill covered 10,000 square miles of coastline, fouling two national parks, a national forest, two wildlife refuges, five state parks, four critical habitat areas and a state game sanctuary.  The spill disrupted the local economy and culture that focused on fishing.  The effects of the toxic, high sulfur sludge--crude mixed with seawater--on wildlife was extremely devastating.  An estimated 250,000 seabirds were killed.  Fourteen of the thirty six resident killer whales disappeared.  One thousand sea otter carcasses were recovered.  One hundred fifty-one bald eagles were confirmed dead.  The Pacific herring population crashed in 1993 and is still too low to sustain a commercial fishery.  The depressing list of wildlife casualties goes on. government made any effort to collect the money for restoration projects that would employ Alaskans. Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility have asked US Attorney General Eric Holder and Alaska's Acting Attorney General Richard Svobodny to act immediately to collect the overdue claim against the company.
government made any effort to collect the money for restoration projects that would employ Alaskans. Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility have asked US Attorney General Eric Holder and Alaska's Acting Attorney General Richard Svobodny to act immediately to collect the overdue claim against the company.  On Thursday of last week the five countries with polar bear populations met to implement the 1973 agreement on conservation of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) intended to give the apex predators a fighting chance for survival as global warming melts their sea ice hunting grounds. A plan for action will be drawn up by bear biologists.  Appropriately, the scheme is circumpolar in scope with protected areas for denning in winter and no hunting in summer.  Industrial activity would be limited in reserves established in those areas of sea ice likely to be the last to melt: the Canadian archipelago and northwest Greenland.   The great white bear prefers the edge of the ice sheet for hunting its favorite food, seals.  Norway  gets credit for hosting the meeting and setting high expectations to save the bear from extinction.  Eric Solheim, minister of the environment for Norway, said on TV that failure to save the bear "would be an amazing crime" against future generations.  The meeting of US, Russia, Canada, Norway and Denmark(Greenland) also called for strong and immediate action to reduce global warming that is severely impacting the bears' habitat.  Any effective plan must also deal with bear hunting by indigenous peoples and trophy hunters in Canada.  Canada is home to about 60% of the world's estimated 22,000-25,000 polar bears Hunters from the south spend up to $35,000 for the opportunity to kill a bear with telescopic high-powered rifle.  One successful trophy guide told the Independent he enjoys the strenuous hunt in subzero temperatures, but does not enjoy killing the quarry.  Nevertheless, he sees no paradox in his business.  Russia, US and Greenland only allow native people to kill the bear for food.    They use all parts of the bear except the liver which is toxic. About 700 bears a year are killed by hunters.  Norway prohibits all hunting.   Last year the US banned the importation of skins when it listed the species under the Endangered Species Act {Polar Bears Win Protection, 5/21/08}, but most countries place no restriction on importation.  Experts consider the current hunting quotas problematic given the extreme climatic challenges facing the great white bear.
On Thursday of last week the five countries with polar bear populations met to implement the 1973 agreement on conservation of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) intended to give the apex predators a fighting chance for survival as global warming melts their sea ice hunting grounds. A plan for action will be drawn up by bear biologists.  Appropriately, the scheme is circumpolar in scope with protected areas for denning in winter and no hunting in summer.  Industrial activity would be limited in reserves established in those areas of sea ice likely to be the last to melt: the Canadian archipelago and northwest Greenland.   The great white bear prefers the edge of the ice sheet for hunting its favorite food, seals.  Norway  gets credit for hosting the meeting and setting high expectations to save the bear from extinction.  Eric Solheim, minister of the environment for Norway, said on TV that failure to save the bear "would be an amazing crime" against future generations.  The meeting of US, Russia, Canada, Norway and Denmark(Greenland) also called for strong and immediate action to reduce global warming that is severely impacting the bears' habitat.  Any effective plan must also deal with bear hunting by indigenous peoples and trophy hunters in Canada.  Canada is home to about 60% of the world's estimated 22,000-25,000 polar bears Hunters from the south spend up to $35,000 for the opportunity to kill a bear with telescopic high-powered rifle.  One successful trophy guide told the Independent he enjoys the strenuous hunt in subzero temperatures, but does not enjoy killing the quarry.  Nevertheless, he sees no paradox in his business.  Russia, US and Greenland only allow native people to kill the bear for food.    They use all parts of the bear except the liver which is toxic. About 700 bears a year are killed by hunters.  Norway prohibits all hunting.   Last year the US banned the importation of skins when it listed the species under the Endangered Species Act {Polar Bears Win Protection, 5/21/08}, but most countries place no restriction on importation.  Experts consider the current hunting quotas problematic given the extreme climatic challenges facing the great white bear. US Person posted previously {Talk About Stress, 2-23-09} that the G-20 was preparing to unveil a plan to replace the US dollar as the world's reserve currency.  China's central bank governor Zhou Xiaochuan, in the run up to the meeting, proposed in an essay on the central bank's website that a new monetary unit should be introduced as part of a global system controlled by the International Monetary Fund.  Beijing has pubically expressed fears for the declining value of its huge investment in US dollars [see chart] as the Federal Reserve continues to digitally manufacture dollars as part of its rescue of the collapsing US economy and international financial market.  Mr. Zhou suggests expanding the role of special drawing rights (SDR) which the IMF introduced after the collapse of the Bretton Woods fixed exchange system.  SDRs are valued in a basket of four currencies: US dollar, Yen, Euro, Pound sterling.  They are used as a unit of account by IMF and some other international organizations.  China proposes to expand the basket of currencies to all major economies and set up a settlement system between SDRs and other currencies so SDRs can be used as an international medium of exchange.  The father of modern liberal economics, John Maynard Keynes, made a similar proposal in the 1940's.
US Person posted previously {Talk About Stress, 2-23-09} that the G-20 was preparing to unveil a plan to replace the US dollar as the world's reserve currency.  China's central bank governor Zhou Xiaochuan, in the run up to the meeting, proposed in an essay on the central bank's website that a new monetary unit should be introduced as part of a global system controlled by the International Monetary Fund.  Beijing has pubically expressed fears for the declining value of its huge investment in US dollars [see chart] as the Federal Reserve continues to digitally manufacture dollars as part of its rescue of the collapsing US economy and international financial market.  Mr. Zhou suggests expanding the role of special drawing rights (SDR) which the IMF introduced after the collapse of the Bretton Woods fixed exchange system.  SDRs are valued in a basket of four currencies: US dollar, Yen, Euro, Pound sterling.  They are used as a unit of account by IMF and some other international organizations.  China proposes to expand the basket of currencies to all major economies and set up a settlement system between SDRs and other currencies so SDRs can be used as an international medium of exchange.  The father of modern liberal economics, John Maynard Keynes, made a similar proposal in the 1940's. 

 From the words of The Who's song, it's the same old boss: the multinational oil companies.  The Iraqi oil minister at an OPEC industry seminar in Vienna said his country would accept bids on new development projects on a 75/25 basis with the minority share going to Iraq.  That is the same deal Saddam Hussein gave to companies like Exxon/Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell before the invasion and occupation of his country by US forces. Previously, when oil prices were twice what they are now, Iraq was only permitting 51% shares to foreign companies.  Iraq is exempted from OPEC's production caps because of war damage to its oil industry infrastructure.  Thirty new wells are up for bid in the giant Halfaya field with five billion barrels of proven reserves. Iraq currently produces 2.4 million barrels per day.  Plans are to increase production to 6 million a day over the next five years.  If you are a cynic or even a rational nonconformist like U.S. Person, you would not argue with claims of "victory" by neo-cons because it seems the flow of Iraqi oil to the West has been secured for the foreseeable future through the use of military force.  Bhuya!
From the words of The Who's song, it's the same old boss: the multinational oil companies.  The Iraqi oil minister at an OPEC industry seminar in Vienna said his country would accept bids on new development projects on a 75/25 basis with the minority share going to Iraq.  That is the same deal Saddam Hussein gave to companies like Exxon/Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell before the invasion and occupation of his country by US forces. Previously, when oil prices were twice what they are now, Iraq was only permitting 51% shares to foreign companies.  Iraq is exempted from OPEC's production caps because of war damage to its oil industry infrastructure.  Thirty new wells are up for bid in the giant Halfaya field with five billion barrels of proven reserves. Iraq currently produces 2.4 million barrels per day.  Plans are to increase production to 6 million a day over the next five years.  If you are a cynic or even a rational nonconformist like U.S. Person, you would not argue with claims of "victory" by neo-cons because it seems the flow of Iraqi oil to the West has been secured for the foreseeable future through the use of military force.  Bhuya!
 The Russian government granted the request of activists and organizations to stop the killing of harp seal pups (P. groenlandica).  Canada remains the only major developed nation that still allows the slaughter of young harp seal for their white pelts.  Minister of Natural Resources and Ecology Yuriy Trutnev announced the ban yesterday in Moscow.  Public opposition to the harp seal hunt has increased with anti-hunting demonstrations taking place in Russian cities.  Trutnev credited public pressure as contributing to the ban's passage. The slaughter was subsidized by the government and according to animal welfare activists there was little demand for pelts dyed black to make hats. The number of pups killed by Russian sealers in 1999 was 34,850. Smaller culls occur in Namibia, Norway and Greenland.  Later this month the Canadian seal slaughter begins. Last year more than 217,000 harp seals were killed, almost all of which were pups under 3 months of age.  Until recently pups were clubbed to death, but Canada outlawed that savagery when it was proved by veterinarians that many pups were being skinned alive.  Seals are also harvested for their meat, and fat used in human beauty products.  International opposition to the harvest is growing according to ENS. The EU Parliament is to vote on a seal products ban on April 1, but a ban must also be approved by member nations before it can take effect.   The ban will come to late to protect pups born this year and not able to swim to safety.
The Russian government granted the request of activists and organizations to stop the killing of harp seal pups (P. groenlandica).  Canada remains the only major developed nation that still allows the slaughter of young harp seal for their white pelts.  Minister of Natural Resources and Ecology Yuriy Trutnev announced the ban yesterday in Moscow.  Public opposition to the harp seal hunt has increased with anti-hunting demonstrations taking place in Russian cities.  Trutnev credited public pressure as contributing to the ban's passage. The slaughter was subsidized by the government and according to animal welfare activists there was little demand for pelts dyed black to make hats. The number of pups killed by Russian sealers in 1999 was 34,850. Smaller culls occur in Namibia, Norway and Greenland.  Later this month the Canadian seal slaughter begins. Last year more than 217,000 harp seals were killed, almost all of which were pups under 3 months of age.  Until recently pups were clubbed to death, but Canada outlawed that savagery when it was proved by veterinarians that many pups were being skinned alive.  Seals are also harvested for their meat, and fat used in human beauty products.  International opposition to the harvest is growing according to ENS. The EU Parliament is to vote on a seal products ban on April 1, but a ban must also be approved by member nations before it can take effect.   The ban will come to late to protect pups born this year and not able to swim to safety. Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT), told CNN that 44's people wanted language inserted in the stimulus bill that would guarantee bonuses in existing employment contracts were honored.  Dodd said that his provision limiting bonuses and severance packages had to be modified or lost altogether in response to the push from the administration.  According to Dodd he did not author the change, but agreed to it reluctantly.  American International Group Inc. has its financial products unit headquartered in Dodd's state.  He also claims he knew nothing about the bonuses at AIG until the scandal hit the media last week. Senator Dodd is chairman of the Senate Banking Committee*.  But Bloomberg reports the previous regime contemplated paying bonuses to AIG employees in November, 2008 under the TARP agreement.  Neil Barofsky, inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program testified before the House Ways and Means Committee today. Million dollar bonuses were paid to 73 employees as "retention pay". Records show about 50 are no longer employed by AIG.  Some bonuses have been returned voluntarily by patriotic recipients.  Taxpayers now own 80% of AIG which means a shareholders suit could be initiated by the government seeking the recovery of the millions in equity or forcing the company into reorganization.  Either way, the bleeding of taxpayer money will continue until the insolvent company is liquidated.
Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT), told CNN that 44's people wanted language inserted in the stimulus bill that would guarantee bonuses in existing employment contracts were honored.  Dodd said that his provision limiting bonuses and severance packages had to be modified or lost altogether in response to the push from the administration.  According to Dodd he did not author the change, but agreed to it reluctantly.  American International Group Inc. has its financial products unit headquartered in Dodd's state.  He also claims he knew nothing about the bonuses at AIG until the scandal hit the media last week. Senator Dodd is chairman of the Senate Banking Committee*.  But Bloomberg reports the previous regime contemplated paying bonuses to AIG employees in November, 2008 under the TARP agreement.  Neil Barofsky, inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program testified before the House Ways and Means Committee today. Million dollar bonuses were paid to 73 employees as "retention pay". Records show about 50 are no longer employed by AIG.  Some bonuses have been returned voluntarily by patriotic recipients.  Taxpayers now own 80% of AIG which means a shareholders suit could be initiated by the government seeking the recovery of the millions in equity or forcing the company into reorganization.  Either way, the bleeding of taxpayer money will continue until the insolvent company is liquidated. The International Whaling Commission met in Rome last week and according to the Environmental News Service a disturbing trend towards resuming commercial whaling has developed.  Rather than continue work on a detailed whale management plan based on tested scientific procedures, the Commission decided to go ahead with an ad hoc quota plan being developed by countries that want to resume commercial whaling. Conservationists see this decision as a capitulation to the demands of whaling nations such as Japan which has killed 5,000 whales in the past five years for so-called "scientific purposes"  The IWC science committee concluded in 2007 that many questions about whale survival such as mortality rates remain unanswered despite this "research".  The reality is that whale meat is a prized food commodity in Japanese markets.  Whale meat is equivalent to our best beefsteaks. The proposed deal would grant Japan unlimited  minke whaling rights in coastal waters in exchange for reducing its harvest in the Southern Ocean near Antarctica.  The IWC chair, a holdover from the previous US regime is leading the new effort to resume whaling.  The plan is being condemned by anti-whaling organizations.  Director of the whale program for the International Fund for Animal Welfare said, "science is being thrown to the whalers like Christians to the lions in ancient Rome."   The head of the Sea Shepherd organization, which mounts direct actions to disrupt whaling operations in the Southern Ocean called for the removal of the American chairman of the IWC.  House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick Rahall (WV-D) has sent a letter to the acting Commerce Secretary asking for a replacement.  The House of Representatives is on record to end commercial whaling around the globe. The Obama administration favors continuing the IWC's moratorium.
The International Whaling Commission met in Rome last week and according to the Environmental News Service a disturbing trend towards resuming commercial whaling has developed.  Rather than continue work on a detailed whale management plan based on tested scientific procedures, the Commission decided to go ahead with an ad hoc quota plan being developed by countries that want to resume commercial whaling. Conservationists see this decision as a capitulation to the demands of whaling nations such as Japan which has killed 5,000 whales in the past five years for so-called "scientific purposes"  The IWC science committee concluded in 2007 that many questions about whale survival such as mortality rates remain unanswered despite this "research".  The reality is that whale meat is a prized food commodity in Japanese markets.  Whale meat is equivalent to our best beefsteaks. The proposed deal would grant Japan unlimited  minke whaling rights in coastal waters in exchange for reducing its harvest in the Southern Ocean near Antarctica.  The IWC chair, a holdover from the previous US regime is leading the new effort to resume whaling.  The plan is being condemned by anti-whaling organizations.  Director of the whale program for the International Fund for Animal Welfare said, "science is being thrown to the whalers like Christians to the lions in ancient Rome."   The head of the Sea Shepherd organization, which mounts direct actions to disrupt whaling operations in the Southern Ocean called for the removal of the American chairman of the IWC.  House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick Rahall (WV-D) has sent a letter to the acting Commerce Secretary asking for a replacement.  The House of Representatives is on record to end commercial whaling around the globe. The Obama administration favors continuing the IWC's moratorium. Who is one to believe?  The "Decider" or the International Red Cross?  My bet is on the Red Cross.  The neutral organization has been caring for wounded soldiers and prisoners of war since 1864.  When asked about the secret ICRC report on the treatment of detainees in CIA custody during a press conference in August 2007 he replied, "Haven't seen it; we don't torture." repeating the lie he first made in a speech on September 6, 2006[*].  This is not a matter of semantics fellow citizens, this is a violation of basic human dignity.  It is equally immaterial whether the tortured captives are terrorists or innocent bystanders.  Torture is illegal under US domestic law and international treaties and morally wrong. Full Stop.  And when torture is committed by the government of the "world's greatest democracy" without consequence something is terribly wrong with civilization.  Americans stood unflinching against the criminal Nazi regime and the Japanese military dictatorship at the cost of half a million lives lost in combat during WWII.  One of the defining principles of that "good war" was that no national leader or government is above accountability for war crimes.  If our government does not take the morally correct action and seek to hold those accountable for crimes that extend into the very sacristy of Washington--the Oval Office--it will be a betrayal of all those thousands who died fighting tyranny.
Who is one to believe?  The "Decider" or the International Red Cross?  My bet is on the Red Cross.  The neutral organization has been caring for wounded soldiers and prisoners of war since 1864.  When asked about the secret ICRC report on the treatment of detainees in CIA custody during a press conference in August 2007 he replied, "Haven't seen it; we don't torture." repeating the lie he first made in a speech on September 6, 2006[*].  This is not a matter of semantics fellow citizens, this is a violation of basic human dignity.  It is equally immaterial whether the tortured captives are terrorists or innocent bystanders.  Torture is illegal under US domestic law and international treaties and morally wrong. Full Stop.  And when torture is committed by the government of the "world's greatest democracy" without consequence something is terribly wrong with civilization.  Americans stood unflinching against the criminal Nazi regime and the Japanese military dictatorship at the cost of half a million lives lost in combat during WWII.  One of the defining principles of that "good war" was that no national leader or government is above accountability for war crimes.  If our government does not take the morally correct action and seek to hold those accountable for crimes that extend into the very sacristy of Washington--the Oval Office--it will be a betrayal of all those thousands who died fighting tyranny. Update:  The WaPo has published the names of some of AIG's counterparties paid with taxpayer money.  Jon Stewart at Comedy Central is getting a lot of credit in the media for taking on "Mad Money" Cramer  and exposing the blatant stock boosting that passes as financial reporting in the US.  But anyone who has read this blog, Zola's Money or even the history of our stock market crash in '29 knows the market is manipulated by insiders {The Invisible Hand Revealed, 6/01/07}.  Now, even Joe "Not So Much" the Plumber knows it.
Update:  The WaPo has published the names of some of AIG's counterparties paid with taxpayer money.  Jon Stewart at Comedy Central is getting a lot of credit in the media for taking on "Mad Money" Cramer  and exposing the blatant stock boosting that passes as financial reporting in the US.  But anyone who has read this blog, Zola's Money or even the history of our stock market crash in '29 knows the market is manipulated by insiders {The Invisible Hand Revealed, 6/01/07}.  Now, even Joe "Not So Much" the Plumber knows it. Some good news from the wildlife conservation front for a change.  Reuters reports that Brazilian federal police arrested 72 people accused of running an international smuggling ring that trading in wild animals.  Police had 102 warrants, but could not execute them all in Operation Oxossi.  The ring smuggled captured animals from parks and ecological reserves, including endangered species such as jaguars, snakes, monkeys and tropical birds, that bring high prices on the international market. One endangered Blue Macaw egg could bring as much as $3800 in Europe making the wildlife trade more lucrative in some cases than drug trafficking.  The global trade in animals and their parts is worth $10 to $20 billion a year ranking third behind arms sales and drugs according to Brazil's National Network Against Wild Animal Trade (Renctas). The organization estimated in 2001 that 38 million wild animals were poached every year. Captured animals usually suffer in inhuman conditions after being taken.  Only about a third survive to be sold. Police associated with the arrests say the traffickers are being charged under criminal anti-gang statutes making convictions with prison sentences more likely. Typically those charged with animal trafficking only face fines.  Many small time traders are poor indigenous people with few options for making a living.
Some good news from the wildlife conservation front for a change.  Reuters reports that Brazilian federal police arrested 72 people accused of running an international smuggling ring that trading in wild animals.  Police had 102 warrants, but could not execute them all in Operation Oxossi.  The ring smuggled captured animals from parks and ecological reserves, including endangered species such as jaguars, snakes, monkeys and tropical birds, that bring high prices on the international market. One endangered Blue Macaw egg could bring as much as $3800 in Europe making the wildlife trade more lucrative in some cases than drug trafficking.  The global trade in animals and their parts is worth $10 to $20 billion a year ranking third behind arms sales and drugs according to Brazil's National Network Against Wild Animal Trade (Renctas). The organization estimated in 2001 that 38 million wild animals were poached every year. Captured animals usually suffer in inhuman conditions after being taken.  Only about a third survive to be sold. Police associated with the arrests say the traffickers are being charged under criminal anti-gang statutes making convictions with prison sentences more likely. Typically those charged with animal trafficking only face fines.  Many small time traders are poor indigenous people with few options for making a living. The House of Representatives failed to pass the wilderness bill which has widespread support in Congress, but failed to muster 2 votes to reach the two-thirds majority required under the rules. The bill has already passed the Senate.  Its defeat in the House should be laid at the feet of the Democratic leadership which subjected it to the two-thirds requirement by not allowing the measure to be amended on the floor.  Repugnants were ready to load it with poison pill provisions on which Democrats in marginal districts did not want to record a vote.  One dubious provision is a law allowing the carrying of concealed weapons in national parks.  Once again good legislation is lost in the endless game of "chicken" played by self-interested politicians.  As it turned out this particular amendment made it into the bill to appease whingeing Repugnants (their fetish for carrying weapons is apparently limitless), but the bill went down to defeat anyway.  House Democrats should gird their loins and try again without subjecting the bill to such an unfair legislative hurdle.
The House of Representatives failed to pass the wilderness bill which has widespread support in Congress, but failed to muster 2 votes to reach the two-thirds majority required under the rules. The bill has already passed the Senate.  Its defeat in the House should be laid at the feet of the Democratic leadership which subjected it to the two-thirds requirement by not allowing the measure to be amended on the floor.  Repugnants were ready to load it with poison pill provisions on which Democrats in marginal districts did not want to record a vote.  One dubious provision is a law allowing the carrying of concealed weapons in national parks.  Once again good legislation is lost in the endless game of "chicken" played by self-interested politicians.  As it turned out this particular amendment made it into the bill to appease whingeing Repugnants (their fetish for carrying weapons is apparently limitless), but the bill went down to defeat anyway.  House Democrats should gird their loins and try again without subjecting the bill to such an unfair legislative hurdle.  That is the amount the seas will rise due to ice cap melting.  Scientists attending a UN conference on climate change in Copenhagen said on Tuesday that the previously predicted 59cm rise was a drastic underestimation.  Improved data from satellites shows that Greenland will once again be green as it looses 200 to 300 cu.km. of ice (7.63 million cu.ft.) into the sea each year.  600 million people live on low lying land formations.  George Will, are you reading this?
That is the amount the seas will rise due to ice cap melting.  Scientists attending a UN conference on climate change in Copenhagen said on Tuesday that the previously predicted 59cm rise was a drastic underestimation.  Improved data from satellites shows that Greenland will once again be green as it looses 200 to 300 cu.km. of ice (7.63 million cu.ft.) into the sea each year.  600 million people live on low lying land formations.  George Will, are you reading this? The nation's only high level radioactive waste depository is loosing funding in the Obama administration budget.  That is good news for the people of southern Nevada were the Yucca Mountain site is located ninety miles from Las Vegas. Senate majority leader Henry Reid has vigorously opposed burying radioactive waste in the underground salt dome.  He called the budget cut the "most significant victory to date to protect Nevada from becoming the country's toxic wasteland".  Recent geological studies show that underground water flows through the ridge in greater amounts that first estimated raising the possibility of corrosion damage to waste vessels intended to last for a millennium.  Proponents of nuclear power as a clean alternative fuel both within the administration and in the industry have been dealt a serious setback. The problem with nuclear power has always been the permanent disposal of radioactive waste from the nuclear fuel cycle. {Nuclear is Not an Option, 12/31/2007}.  Without a depository, depleted fuel rods and other high level waste must be stored in temporary facilities near the reactors. Approximately 57,700 tons of nuclear waste are stored at more than 100 temporary sites.  Each year 2,000 more tons are generated.  France reprocesses its spent fuel, but many experts believe this solution creates as many problems as it solves.  There are no plans to withdraw the repository license application to avoid industry lawsuits.  So far the government has spend $13.5 billion on the project.  If completed, total costs are expected to exceed $96.2 billion.  The Regime planned to have the Yucca Mountain facility on line by 2020.
The nation's only high level radioactive waste depository is loosing funding in the Obama administration budget.  That is good news for the people of southern Nevada were the Yucca Mountain site is located ninety miles from Las Vegas. Senate majority leader Henry Reid has vigorously opposed burying radioactive waste in the underground salt dome.  He called the budget cut the "most significant victory to date to protect Nevada from becoming the country's toxic wasteland".  Recent geological studies show that underground water flows through the ridge in greater amounts that first estimated raising the possibility of corrosion damage to waste vessels intended to last for a millennium.  Proponents of nuclear power as a clean alternative fuel both within the administration and in the industry have been dealt a serious setback. The problem with nuclear power has always been the permanent disposal of radioactive waste from the nuclear fuel cycle. {Nuclear is Not an Option, 12/31/2007}.  Without a depository, depleted fuel rods and other high level waste must be stored in temporary facilities near the reactors. Approximately 57,700 tons of nuclear waste are stored at more than 100 temporary sites.  Each year 2,000 more tons are generated.  France reprocesses its spent fuel, but many experts believe this solution creates as many problems as it solves.  There are no plans to withdraw the repository license application to avoid industry lawsuits.  So far the government has spend $13.5 billion on the project.  If completed, total costs are expected to exceed $96.2 billion.  The Regime planned to have the Yucca Mountain facility on line by 2020.
 The US Fish & Wildlife Service reversed a critical habitat designation for the Canadian Lynx (Lynx canadensis) made during the Regime by former deputy assistant secretary Julie MacDonald.  MacDonald was forced to resign in disgrace after the Department of Interior's inspector general determined she improperly pressured federal biologists to reach conclusions favoring industry over species preservation. The lynx decision favored timber interests by restricting the critical habitat designation to just 1,841 sq. miles (476,817 hectares) within existing national parks. A specialist hunter, the lynx requires a large territory to survive. The revised designation covers 39,000 sq. miles in Maine, Minnesota, Montana and Washington where dense conifer forests provide snowshoe hares for food, large woody debris piles for dens, and deep powder snow cover for long periods. Because critical habitat for a protected species under the Endangered Species Act requires special management considerations, commercial interests which require federal permits are often opposed to new or expanded designations.   All of the newly designated critical habitat is considered occupied by biologists based on verified records of lynx sightings and reproduction.  In 2009 Colorado began a reintroduction program to the lynx's historic range. A Colorado born lynx gave birth to two kittens in 2006 indicating the possibility of a successful reintroduction.  But in 2007 several lynx were killed possibly by fur poachers since only the radio collars were left behind.   The lynx has been protected since 2000 as a threatened species, and it is illegal to hunt or trap the fur bearing animals except in Alaska.
The US Fish & Wildlife Service reversed a critical habitat designation for the Canadian Lynx (Lynx canadensis) made during the Regime by former deputy assistant secretary Julie MacDonald.  MacDonald was forced to resign in disgrace after the Department of Interior's inspector general determined she improperly pressured federal biologists to reach conclusions favoring industry over species preservation. The lynx decision favored timber interests by restricting the critical habitat designation to just 1,841 sq. miles (476,817 hectares) within existing national parks. A specialist hunter, the lynx requires a large territory to survive. The revised designation covers 39,000 sq. miles in Maine, Minnesota, Montana and Washington where dense conifer forests provide snowshoe hares for food, large woody debris piles for dens, and deep powder snow cover for long periods. Because critical habitat for a protected species under the Endangered Species Act requires special management considerations, commercial interests which require federal permits are often opposed to new or expanded designations.   All of the newly designated critical habitat is considered occupied by biologists based on verified records of lynx sightings and reproduction.  In 2009 Colorado began a reintroduction program to the lynx's historic range. A Colorado born lynx gave birth to two kittens in 2006 indicating the possibility of a successful reintroduction.  But in 2007 several lynx were killed possibly by fur poachers since only the radio collars were left behind.   The lynx has been protected since 2000 as a threatened species, and it is illegal to hunt or trap the fur bearing animals except in Alaska.
 Secretary of  State Hillary Clinton's strong statement against destroying Palestinian homes in East Jerusalem is the beginning of what hopefully is a more balanced foreign policy towards Israel.  But it is only a beginning. Among many difficult problems to be solved  are the unauthorized Jewish settlements in the West Bank. Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair John Kerry (D-MA) made this key point in his address at the Brookings Institute on Wednesday when he said, "we are serious about Israel freezing settlement activity in the West Bank." Despite the recent resort to violence by both sides, the outlines of a final solution are becoming clearer Senator Kerry said.  Inevitably conflict resolution will require sacrifice on the part of some Israelis in the the interest of a permanent peace, but it need not be without some compensation for the improvements left behind.  Certainly the settlements should not be destroyed as Israel did in Sinai when captured territory was returned to Egypt.  Also, settlers should be given a formal choice of where to live if their communities are affected by a peace agreement.  They will undoubtedly prefer not to live in a Muslim state as a minority.  The two regions of the new Palestine will need a secure land and air corridor if it is to achieve any economic independence as a state, but that can be accomplished through a long term joint security arrangement which does not require Israel to relinquish sovereignty over land within its recognized international boarders. Expecting Israel to allow the return of Palestinians displaced 60 years ago to its territory is unreasonable.  International aid to Palestine for absorption of the diaspora, or individual family compensation for those having a demonstrable claim may be a way forward to the final solution.  Untying the Gordian knot of this conflict will take time and will need to be done in careful stages.  But both sides seem genuinely tired of conflict and have accepted the fact that they want a permanent divorce. The United States will be only be too happy to divide the household goods for them.
Secretary of  State Hillary Clinton's strong statement against destroying Palestinian homes in East Jerusalem is the beginning of what hopefully is a more balanced foreign policy towards Israel.  But it is only a beginning. Among many difficult problems to be solved  are the unauthorized Jewish settlements in the West Bank. Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair John Kerry (D-MA) made this key point in his address at the Brookings Institute on Wednesday when he said, "we are serious about Israel freezing settlement activity in the West Bank." Despite the recent resort to violence by both sides, the outlines of a final solution are becoming clearer Senator Kerry said.  Inevitably conflict resolution will require sacrifice on the part of some Israelis in the the interest of a permanent peace, but it need not be without some compensation for the improvements left behind.  Certainly the settlements should not be destroyed as Israel did in Sinai when captured territory was returned to Egypt.  Also, settlers should be given a formal choice of where to live if their communities are affected by a peace agreement.  They will undoubtedly prefer not to live in a Muslim state as a minority.  The two regions of the new Palestine will need a secure land and air corridor if it is to achieve any economic independence as a state, but that can be accomplished through a long term joint security arrangement which does not require Israel to relinquish sovereignty over land within its recognized international boarders. Expecting Israel to allow the return of Palestinians displaced 60 years ago to its territory is unreasonable.  International aid to Palestine for absorption of the diaspora, or individual family compensation for those having a demonstrable claim may be a way forward to the final solution.  Untying the Gordian knot of this conflict will take time and will need to be done in careful stages.  But both sides seem genuinely tired of conflict and have accepted the fact that they want a permanent divorce. The United States will be only be too happy to divide the household goods for them. Since the government is going to be in business with America's largest corporations it should be done with companies that promise to make socially and environmentally acceptable products.  A look at General Motors and Honda shows the native company mired in debt slowly dying despite billions in government financial aid while Honda, suffering lower sales (except for sales of its hybrid cars) because of the worldwide depression,  is announcing the debut of its new Class 8 hybrid truck assembled by Peterbuilt Motors Company in Georgia. Auditors examining GM's books for its annual SEC report are uncovering a bleak house of plummeting sales, reoccurring operating losses and inability to raise new capital.  These conditions are choking the company's cash flow and threatening the "going concern" rating. Failure to achieve such a rating from auditors could trigger more loan default clauses.  During the past 3 years GM has piled up $82 billion in losses.  It has received $13.4 in federal loans. GM's stock price fell to $1.80 after the market close on Wednesday.  The company now faces the March 31 deadline for signed agreements from debt holders and the UAW which it needs to demonstrate to the government it can become a viable company again.  GM will have to close five more factories and layoff 47,000 workers world wide to survive. The alternative is a Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Since the government is going to be in business with America's largest corporations it should be done with companies that promise to make socially and environmentally acceptable products.  A look at General Motors and Honda shows the native company mired in debt slowly dying despite billions in government financial aid while Honda, suffering lower sales (except for sales of its hybrid cars) because of the worldwide depression,  is announcing the debut of its new Class 8 hybrid truck assembled by Peterbuilt Motors Company in Georgia. Auditors examining GM's books for its annual SEC report are uncovering a bleak house of plummeting sales, reoccurring operating losses and inability to raise new capital.  These conditions are choking the company's cash flow and threatening the "going concern" rating. Failure to achieve such a rating from auditors could trigger more loan default clauses.  During the past 3 years GM has piled up $82 billion in losses.  It has received $13.4 in federal loans. GM's stock price fell to $1.80 after the market close on Wednesday.  The company now faces the March 31 deadline for signed agreements from debt holders and the UAW which it needs to demonstrate to the government it can become a viable company again.  GM will have to close five more factories and layoff 47,000 workers world wide to survive. The alternative is a Chapter 11 bankruptcy. 
 President B. H. Obama went to the Department of Interior on Tuesday and told the gathered civil servants that the previous occupant was wrong to issue a rule change abrogating the consultation requirement for government projects impacting protected species.  {1/21/09, 43 Slips One Pass} On the 160th anniversary of the Interior Department he told the cheering audience that restoring the consultation rule "would restore the scientific process to its rightful place at the heart of the Endangered Species Act".  While not technically not overruling the change, Mr. Obama's memorandum instructs agencies to use the consultation process in every case, until formal rule making can begin.  The same discredited thinking was espoused by the US Chamber of Commerce in response to the reversal which called the rule intended to force agencies to consider environmental impacts of their development projects, "added red tape".
President B. H. Obama went to the Department of Interior on Tuesday and told the gathered civil servants that the previous occupant was wrong to issue a rule change abrogating the consultation requirement for government projects impacting protected species.  {1/21/09, 43 Slips One Pass} On the 160th anniversary of the Interior Department he told the cheering audience that restoring the consultation rule "would restore the scientific process to its rightful place at the heart of the Endangered Species Act".  While not technically not overruling the change, Mr. Obama's memorandum instructs agencies to use the consultation process in every case, until formal rule making can begin.  The same discredited thinking was espoused by the US Chamber of Commerce in response to the reversal which called the rule intended to force agencies to consider environmental impacts of their development projects, "added red tape". President Barack Obama has written to President Demitry Medvedev suggesting that the United States would abandon plans for a missile shield in Eastern Europe if Russia would help the U.S. convince Iran to stop development of nuclear weapons.{11/08/08, The Old Game}  The approach is no doubt welcomed by the Russian leadership who grew restive after eight years of jingoist bombast from the Charlatan. President Obama's letter should open the way for increased cooperation with our former allies. President Medvedev will meet with Obama in early April.  Obama will need to steel himself against the cries of outrage from the political neanderthals of the right-wing if he is to "reset" a new era of cooperation in Europe.
President Barack Obama has written to President Demitry Medvedev suggesting that the United States would abandon plans for a missile shield in Eastern Europe if Russia would help the U.S. convince Iran to stop development of nuclear weapons.{11/08/08, The Old Game}  The approach is no doubt welcomed by the Russian leadership who grew restive after eight years of jingoist bombast from the Charlatan. President Obama's letter should open the way for increased cooperation with our former allies. President Medvedev will meet with Obama in early April.  Obama will need to steel himself against the cries of outrage from the political neanderthals of the right-wing if he is to "reset" a new era of cooperation in Europe. Update:  The traps are set and the unwanted stellar sea lions come and go. No California sea lions, those greedy salmon gobbling enemies of fishermen, have appeared at the base of the Bonneville dam.  It is almost as if they know if they are captured their life is over.  Officials publicly admitted captured sea lions will be euthanized. The Stumptown newspaper in its irritating know it all editorial voice, supports the killings in this way:  "We know that sea lions are not to blame for the demise of Columbia salmon.  The fish runs collapsed because of dams, overfishing and habitat destruction."  Their idea of logic is to kill the seal lions to fix the problem because making dams easier to get over or removing the unneeded ones is too expensive.  The editorial board is even unwilling to reduce the sport fisherman's catch limits because "Sport fishing provides hundreds of millions of dollars in annual economic benefit." Buffalo hunting was lucrative in its day too.
Update:  The traps are set and the unwanted stellar sea lions come and go. No California sea lions, those greedy salmon gobbling enemies of fishermen, have appeared at the base of the Bonneville dam.  It is almost as if they know if they are captured their life is over.  Officials publicly admitted captured sea lions will be euthanized. The Stumptown newspaper in its irritating know it all editorial voice, supports the killings in this way:  "We know that sea lions are not to blame for the demise of Columbia salmon.  The fish runs collapsed because of dams, overfishing and habitat destruction."  Their idea of logic is to kill the seal lions to fix the problem because making dams easier to get over or removing the unneeded ones is too expensive.  The editorial board is even unwilling to reduce the sport fisherman's catch limits because "Sport fishing provides hundreds of millions of dollars in annual economic benefit." Buffalo hunting was lucrative in its day too. Senator Patrick Leahy's (D-VT) proposal to hold a public congressional inquiry into the war crimes of the Bush Regime is gaining traction in Washington.  As well it might since the public is expressing its displeasure over an increasing awareness torture was used as official policy of the United States, and their civil liberties were trampled in the name of an amorphous "war on terror"[1].  Discussions have centered around the ultimate purpose of such an inquiry.  National reconciliation after a divisive invasion is often mentioned, but an equally debilitating consensus may be forming that no criminal prosecutions will take place as a result of information divulged during the proceedings.  Also, any witness appearing before the commission will probably be offered immunity in return for testimony.  Which may explain why Alberto "Gonzo" Gonzales the former attorney general whose Justice Department provided the alleged legal justifications for the use of torture--euphemistically termed "enhanced interrogation"--is so willing to appear before the proposed committee of inquiry. Alexander Cockburn reported two years ago that Air Force Lt. General Randall Schmidt made a 55 page sworn statement that former Defense Secretary Rumsfeld gave verbal and written approval to torture detainees at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib.  Since then potential evidence has repeatedly surfaced directly connecting top Regime officials to the torture policy[2].  Despite the damning evidence an independent committee could be misused as political theatre to distract an angry public and derail any moves to prosecute officials deemed responsible for illegal actions. Speaker Pelosi has voiced concern about the possible misuse of immunity grants and lack of criminal prosecutions resulting from a "truth commission".  Complicating matters, the Senate Intelligence Committee announced it would hold its own hearings in private concerning the CIA's role in operating the rendition and interrogation programs. Congressional aides have already said that the investigation will not be used to determine wrongdoing, but merely to gather information that was withheld from Congress during the Regime.  Some of this information, such as the location of black detention sites in foreign countries, is considered by Washington insiders to be among the agency's "crown jewels".   Already Senator Christopher Bond (R-MO) the ranking minority member of the Senate's Intelligence Committee has labeled the Leahy proposal for a public truth commission a "witch hunt".   The Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Sentator Leahy will hold hearings on the composition of an independent inquiry. The public wants the truth, but not at the expense of justice.
Senator Patrick Leahy's (D-VT) proposal to hold a public congressional inquiry into the war crimes of the Bush Regime is gaining traction in Washington.  As well it might since the public is expressing its displeasure over an increasing awareness torture was used as official policy of the United States, and their civil liberties were trampled in the name of an amorphous "war on terror"[1].  Discussions have centered around the ultimate purpose of such an inquiry.  National reconciliation after a divisive invasion is often mentioned, but an equally debilitating consensus may be forming that no criminal prosecutions will take place as a result of information divulged during the proceedings.  Also, any witness appearing before the commission will probably be offered immunity in return for testimony.  Which may explain why Alberto "Gonzo" Gonzales the former attorney general whose Justice Department provided the alleged legal justifications for the use of torture--euphemistically termed "enhanced interrogation"--is so willing to appear before the proposed committee of inquiry. Alexander Cockburn reported two years ago that Air Force Lt. General Randall Schmidt made a 55 page sworn statement that former Defense Secretary Rumsfeld gave verbal and written approval to torture detainees at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib.  Since then potential evidence has repeatedly surfaced directly connecting top Regime officials to the torture policy[2].  Despite the damning evidence an independent committee could be misused as political theatre to distract an angry public and derail any moves to prosecute officials deemed responsible for illegal actions. Speaker Pelosi has voiced concern about the possible misuse of immunity grants and lack of criminal prosecutions resulting from a "truth commission".  Complicating matters, the Senate Intelligence Committee announced it would hold its own hearings in private concerning the CIA's role in operating the rendition and interrogation programs. Congressional aides have already said that the investigation will not be used to determine wrongdoing, but merely to gather information that was withheld from Congress during the Regime.  Some of this information, such as the location of black detention sites in foreign countries, is considered by Washington insiders to be among the agency's "crown jewels".   Already Senator Christopher Bond (R-MO) the ranking minority member of the Senate's Intelligence Committee has labeled the Leahy proposal for a public truth commission a "witch hunt".   The Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Sentator Leahy will hold hearings on the composition of an independent inquiry. The public wants the truth, but not at the expense of justice.