data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/896bd/896bd86c6fb82782ec82dde805bbc1a71d275e8a" alt=""
US Person will be on safari next week and during the month of June. So come back later this summer to check out the high impact blog at Persona Non Grata.
Jackal pup, Namibia
Let me see if I can simplify this. It [a synthetic index] exists only as a spreadsheet and performs in conjunction with the components it's modeled upon. Numerous hedge funds did not think the rating agencies knew what they were talking about when it came to the mortgage ratings. They also believed we were in a housing bubble. So they went to a number of investment banks and asked them to construct synthetic (derivative) CDOs [based on BBB mortgage tranches] that they could short. And there were buyers on the other side who wanted the yield, who trusted the agencies, and who believed that housing could only go up. As to the Goldman deal, the buyers had to know there was someone short on the other side. By definition there was a short. The hedge funds that shorted the synthetic CDOs took real risk. [but Paulson had a hand in creating the synthetic and knew what components were being modeled] They had to pay the interest on the underlying tranches to the investors who were long. And if the housing market continued to rise, and the bubble did not burst, they could easily lose a lot, if not all, of their money....Let's be very clear. This was purely gambling. No money was invested in mortgages or any productive enterprise. This was one group betting against another, and a LOT of these deals were done all over New York and London.Paulson & Co. had a hand in creating the synthetic and therefore knew what components were being modeled. Perhaps not the same as dealing poker with a stacked deck because the banks could have checked the deck themselves. But as Mauldin points out, they wanted the yield. Who was underwriting this fanciful gambling between card sharks? Answer: US taxpayers. When the housing market did collapse, Goldman and other Wall Street firms "too big to fail" were hauled out of the mess they created with taxpayer funds doled out by the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve. The underlying investments that failed served absolutely no useful public service. Heads I win, tails you loose, and a textbook case of why we need derivative trading in a regulated market and the re-establishment of the Glass-Steagall Act prohibition against banks owning other financial institutions.