[credit: The Global Mail] |
Second, older populations mean less consumption. For the Earth, already taxed beyond sustainability by human consumption, this is good news, but bad news for economies that exist by consumerism. Some pundits have labeled the world economy a giant Ponzi scheme(e.g Mitch Feierstein, Planet Ponzi). Half the world, including most of the developed world is reproducing below replacement level. No one really knows what will happen to economies based on consumption and service because this has never happened before in human history. The future appears to be one of fewer people living with less consumption and lower need for resource exploitation. That cannot be all bad unless you are a "free-market" ideologue addicted to arbitrage, war and private concentrations of capital.
[source: ZeroHedge.com]
*A key academic analysis underpinning global austerity policy was recently found to be based on data errors. Reinhart & Rogoff wrote in their paper, "Growth in a Time of Debt" (2010) that countries which have debt higher than 90% of GDP do not grow, but have a slightly negative average growth rate (contraction). When other researchers attempted to duplicate their results, they found that Reinhart & Rogoff massaged their data by excluding Australia (1946-1950), Canada (1946-1950) and New Zealand (1946-1949) all economies that grew during those periods with debt levels >90%. The authors in question also committed a rather large spreadsheet coding error leaving out five countries from their calculations. Opps! The reviewing researchers found after correcting the errors the actual growth rate of countries with higher than 90% debt ratios is actually 2.2% not -0.1% as claimed. Further, some prominent economists conclude that the relationship between debt and economic growth is the reverse of what Reinhart & Rogoff concluded: slow growth causes high debt levels. US Person follows this line of thinking.