'Toontime: Disloyal Bully

Update: Robert Mueller just finished seven hours of testimony before the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees. US Person's takeaway: the gravity of Il Douce's crime¹ of coordinating with foreign espionage agents attempting to influence a federal election was laid bare. Mueller intended for Congress to decide whether he should be arraigned, i.e. impeached, leaving that decision to the proper constitutional authority--the House of Representatives. Impeachment inquiry, now!  If NOT, then his criminality will become the new normal, and he would do it again.

credit: Ed Wexler

{20.07.29}How do you deal with a racist bully? Anyone who survived the school yard should be able to tell you: give him what he is asking for. Nancy Pelosi's sole reliance on the results of the next rigged election (remember the Electoral College) is historically misplaced.  Don Veto has made his reelection strategy clear: the same as last time, relying on a largely white, nationalist base that thrills to blatant themes of racial superiority.  Just watch the video from his recent rally of the "patriotic" Volk of North Carolina!  What is frightening is that strategy might work again; all the pundits and polls said Hillary would win last time. Surprise!

Democrats need to begin the impeachment process now because Il Douche's high crimes and misdemeanors must be revealed to the world, and NOT in a 448 page bureaucratic tome.  Empty witness chairs are simply underwhelming the narrative, nor dispelling the rhetorical hypnotism of "No obstruction; No collusion!" So what if he is eventually let off after a public trial by the dying GOP?  Even"'your favorite President" cannot politically survive a daily dose of reality TV courtesy of the House Judiciary Committee.  The inescapable fact is that he, through his campaign minions, cooperated with a foreign adversary to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.  Technically its not treason, but it is illegal. No collusion?  It is not defined in federal law, but there was a lot of cooperation.²

Is Don Veto more disloyal than this man? Discuss.

1. Acknowledged as such by Robert Mueller in response to a closing question from the House Intelligence Chairman, Adam Schiff.

² 52 U.S.C. Section 30121 (a)(2) prohibits contributions or donations from foreign nationals, including "in-kind" contributions,   "made in cooperation, consultation or concert with, or at the request or suggestion of, a candidate, a candidate’s authorized committee, or their agents, or a political party committee or its agents."  Proof of a conspiracy therefore need not be present to commit a federal election law crime. The FEC Commissioner had to resort to Twitter to remind everyone that accepting contributions, including in-kind contributions, from foreign agents is illegal after Don Veto signaled he would still be interested in derogatory information from a foreign government seeking to influence a federal election.  When asked if he would report such activity to the FBI, he responded by saying he has 'never in his life contacted the FBI'--this, from a businessman that has cut deals with the mob and red lined minorities from his housing projects.  The Trump campaign did more than coordinate with the Russian agitprop operation. As noted by Mueller, his campaign "welcomed" the help it was getting from Russian espionage.  According to the the report, “the social media campaign and the GRU hacking operations coincided with a series of contacts between Trump Campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government."  One of these contracts was through campaign manager Paul Manafort, who materially aided Russian agents by providing confidential polling information to Konstantin Kiliminick, a known Russian operative.  This data could have included demographic analysis by Cambridge Analytics, a company owned by Repugnant mega donor, Robert Mercer.  This information could have allowed agents to target their on line agitprop to susceptible voters in swing states, crucial to winning the Electoral College vote.  Mueller's two year investigation never determined what happened to this proprietary polling data shared with the Russians.  Nevertheless, Muelller's investigation did pose a serious enough threat to Il Douche, that he launched a brazen subversion of it. Clearly there are more facts to be uncovered, which might lead to establishing a criminal conspiracy, or at least more evidence of intentional coordination with foreign agents, which is illegal under federal election law.

The New York Times issued 19 questions it thinks Mueller should be asked. #17:Do you believe you got to the bottom of whether the Trump campaign coordinated with WikiLeaks on releasing the emails that Russia stole from Democrats?  Would such interactions have been legal? Ethical?  US Person thinks that answer is a resounding, NO, but he is a commie radical who hates 'Merica according to Il Douche, so never mind!