A federal judge in New Mexico has sided with ranchers and miners in ruling that 765,00 acres of land could no longer be protected as critical habitat for the jaguar. The US Fish & Wildlife Service designated the area in southeaswtern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico in 2914 in the hopes that Mexican jaguars in search of territory would migrate north across the border. At least six males have been documented in the US borderlands in the last two decades. No females have been recorded in the US range since 1963. Consequently the legal decision agreed with conservation opponents that the protections were "arbitrary and capricious". For years ranchers complained that the protections made it harded to obtain grazing permits and build infrastructure such as corrals and fencing.
The Arizona Game & Fish Department opposed the critical habitat designation, claiming the presence of males in the state was incidental, not worthy of a conservation response. Conservationists think otherwise. The federal wildlife agency lost three lawsuits, forcing it to formulate a recovery plan and designate critical habitat, despite the opinion of conservationist Alan Rabinowitz, former CEO of Panthera, who expressed in a 2010 essay, that funds were better spent preserving the species in Latin America. The Center for Biological Diversity said it will ask the Biden Administration to "carefully redesignate the jaguar's critical habitat so it can withstand the livestock industry's cynical lawsuits."Because after all, jaguar lives matter. [photo credit: Northern Jaguar Project; Sonoran female named Ali Lopes]